Thank you to our Sponsor: Lessie AI

AI has traditionally been seen as a technology that needs to reflect human values. The majority of AI ethics debates have centered on questions such as how to ensure fairness to people, how to avoid bias, how to protect privacy, and how to maintain safety when autonomous systems make decisions. Yet as AI systems move from being tools for human operators to being autonomous agents that increasingly interact with other machines, the ethical frame begins to shift. Machines are now negotiating with each other in domains such as data transmission, computational scheduling, and traffic coordination. This opens a new frontier known as synthetic ethics, which deals with the encoding of values not only for human to machine interactions but also for machine-to-machine coordination.

Synthetic ethics addresses questions that would once have been considered technical but now require value-driven frameworks. These questions include how to allocate resources fairly among autonomous systems, how to determine priority when many agents compete for limited bandwidth, and how to ensure cooperation in multi-agent environments. These are not questions of compassion, empathy, or justice in the human sense. They are questions of stability, predictability, and system-level fairness. Nevertheless, they involve ethical considerations because they require the design of normative frameworks that guide behavior. In other words, even though the agents are machines, they still need codes of conduct that tell them what counts as fair, what counts as cooperative, and what counts as acceptable in their world.

The challenge is therefore not only how to align AI with human norms but also how to build systems of synthetic ethics that govern machine societies. Here we tackle how AI is being used to shape synthetic ethics, why it matters for the functioning of future infrastructures, and what risks and opportunities emerge when machines begin to live under ethical frameworks of their own.

The Foundations of Synthetic Ethics

Synthetic ethics can be defined as the creation of normative principles and value systems that allow autonomous machines to coordinate and coexist with each other. Unlike human-centered ethics, which is about moral obligations, rights, and values, synthetic ethics is about rules of conduct that maximize stability and cooperation in machine communities. It takes seriously the idea that autonomous agents, once deployed, must constantly interact with other agents without direct human oversight.

Key characteristics include:

• Synthetic ethics is not primarily about human dignity but about operational fairness among agents.

• It establishes rules for distributing limited resources so that systems function without collapse.

• It extends alignment research to ensure machines align with each other’s expectations, not just with human intentions.

The need for synthetic ethics arises from the growing complexity of machine networks. Distributed computing systems, autonomous vehicle fleets, and global communication infrastructures all involve millions of interactions every second. Human oversight cannot resolve each conflict in real time. Instead, AI must be designed to mediate these conflicts, making decisions about which task should proceed, which packet should be delayed, and which request should take priority.

Machine-to-Machine Coordination

Coordination among machines is already a reality in fields ranging from telecommunications to robotics. Without structured values, these systems would face inefficiency or failure.

Practical coordination challenges include:

• Fairness among agents: Machines that compete for resources must not be allowed to monopolize them. Fairness ensures continuity of service and stability of the system.

• Resource allocation: In cloud computing, prioritization is essential. AI can prevent GPU monopolization by distributing cycles proportionally to need and importance.

• Negotiation and arbitration: In transport networks, autonomous cars must negotiate priority at intersections. Arbitration protocols avoid deadlocks and minimize delay.

One striking example is the growing need for synthetic ethics in 5G and 6G telecommunications. With billions of devices online, not all requests can be served at once. Fair prioritization must be applied so that emergency communications and health-related signals are not lost in a flood of entertainment traffic. Without synthetic ethics, the system could collapse under congestion.

Another example is autonomous logistics. Delivery drones operating in the same airspace need to coordinate routes to avoid collisions. If each drone pursued only its own goals, chaos would ensue. By embedding fairness rules that prioritize urgent deliveries and coordinate flight paths, synthetic ethics ensures that the collective system works smoothly.

Encoding Values Beyond Human-Centric Norms

Machines operate in domains where human ethics often provides little guidance. While humans debate moral rights and duties, machines face questions such as whether to prioritize throughput over latency, or whether to minimize energy use at the expense of speed. These tradeoffs require frameworks that look like ethics but are specialized for machine societies.

Examples of synthetic values include:

• Preventing deadlocks: Systems are designed so that every agent eventually receives access to needed resources, ensuring continued operation.

• Emergent fairness: Reinforcement learning agents often evolve strategies that balance short-term competition with long-term cooperation. This suggests that fairness can be learned dynamically.

• Cross-domain applications: Synthetic ethics principles apply across multiple fields, from robotics to cloud computing. The same logic that prevents one robot from monopolizing a task can prevent one process from monopolizing network bandwidth.

In telecommunications, AI models are increasingly used to dynamically classify traffic. They can distinguish between critical and non-critical communications, assigning priority in ways that reflect synthetic fairness. In robotics, task allocation protocols divide work among agents so that efficiency is maximized without overburdening any single unit.

Case Studies and Applications

The practical implications of synthetic ethics can be illustrated through several cases.

• Autonomous vehicles: Cars must often resolve ambiguous situations. If traffic lights fail, synthetic ethics helps vehicles negotiate who proceeds first. This is not just about traffic law but about fairness in preventing one vehicle from repeatedly deferring while others move ahead.

• Cloud computing: AI systems allocate workloads across massive clusters. Without synthetic ethics, certain applications might be starved of resources. With prioritization algorithms, even background processes can progress, maintaining balance across the system.

• Swarm robotics: In agriculture, hundreds of drones may operate simultaneously. Synthetic ethics ensures that no area is neglected and that the swarm distributes effort efficiently.

• Telecommunications: Congestion management depends on AI prioritization. During emergencies, synthetic ethics ensures that distress calls and critical infrastructure communications are prioritized.

Each of these cases demonstrates how machine societies rely on normative frameworks that cannot simply be reduced to technical optimization. They require encoded values that guide coordination in ways that humans would consider acceptable and machines would consider stable.

Technical Dimensions

Synthetic ethics depends on a range of technical tools.

Core approaches include:

• Reinforcement learning: Multi-agent reinforcement learning allows machines to evolve cooperative strategies that balance individual and collective goals.

• Game theory: Coordination problems can be modeled mathematically. Nash equilibria and Pareto efficiency concepts help designers predict how agents will behave under synthetic fairness rules.

• Mechanism design: By structuring incentives, designers can ensure that agents are better off cooperating than competing destructively.

• Standardized communication protocols: Machines must share signals about priority, urgency, and willingness to compromise. Without this, fairness cannot be implemented effectively.

In addition, AI systems often act as arbitration engines. Large models trained on conflict resolution tasks can function as mediators among machines, making decisions about prioritization that reflect synthetic ethical codes. This transforms AI into a kind of ethical authority within machine communities.

Challenges and Risks

The field of synthetic ethics is not without obstacles.

Major challenges are:

• Bias in prioritization systems: If synthetic ethics is poorly designed, some agents may consistently lose out, undermining efficiency and fairness.

• Conflict with human values: Machine fairness may sometimes disadvantage human needs. A system optimizing for throughput might prioritize machine telemetry over human calls.

• Adversarial exploitation: Malicious agents could manipulate fairness rules. By signaling false urgency, an attacker could gain priority access, disrupting the system.

• Opacity of emergent ethics: In multi-agent simulations, fairness can emerge in ways that designers do not fully understand. This raises accountability issues when outcomes are unexpected.

• Scalability: What works in small systems may fail in global infrastructures. Designing synthetic ethics that scales across millions of machines remains a major hurdle.

These risks show why synthetic ethics cannot be treated as a purely technical challenge. It requires governance, transparency, and constant monitoring.

Legal, Social, and Philosophical Implications

Synthetic ethics opens up complex questions of regulation and governance.

Points to consider:

• Governance: Who sets the ethical rules for machines. Should governments, corporations, or international consortia define these values.

• Interoperability: Global infrastructures require shared standards. Without international agreements, synthetic ethics may fragment across borders.

• Social trust: Human users need to trust that machine coordination systems are fair. If autonomous cars seem to favor some vehicles over others, public confidence will collapse.

• Philosophy: If machines develop their own emergent ethics, do they become participants in moral systems independent of humans. What does it mean if machines value fairness in ways humans cannot fully explain.

These questions highlight that synthetic ethics is not only a technical matter but also a social and philosophical challenge. It forces society to consider whether machines can or should have moral codes that differ from human traditions.

Future Directions

Looking ahead, synthetic ethics will become an integral part of AI-driven infrastructures.

Possible directions include:

• AI-native ethics engines: Systems dedicated to fairness management among agents will be embedded into everything from smart grids to transport networks.

• Machine societies: Autonomous swarms and networks may develop emergent ethical codes, functioning as self-regulating communities of machines.

• Co-evolution with human ethics: Humans will adapt their expectations to machine fairness systems, creating hybrid ethical frameworks.

• Dynamic adaptation: Synthetic ethics may become flexible, adjusting values in real time based on context and system conditions.

These developments suggest that synthetic ethics will grow in scope and complexity, becoming one of the defining features of future technological systems.

AI is not only about aligning with human values but also about shaping new values that govern machine-to-machine interactions. Synthetic ethics provides the framework for this, embedding fairness, prioritization, and cooperation into the core of autonomous systems. The technical methods already exist, but the challenges of bias, adversarial manipulation, and governance remain significant.

By addressing these issues, synthetic ethics can ensure that autonomous systems operate fairly and efficiently, supporting global infrastructures that depend on machine cooperation. At the same time, society must grapple with the possibility that machines may evolve ethical codes of their own, raising philosophical questions about the nature of morality in an AI-driven world.

The success of synthetic ethics will determine not only how well machines cooperate with each other but also how much humans trust the infrastructures built upon them. For that reason, the shaping of synthetic ethics is one of the most important tasks facing AI research and governance today.

Looking to sponsor our Newsletter and Scoble’s X audience?

By sponsoring our newsletter, your company gains exposure to a curated group of AI-focused subscribers which is an audience already engaged in the latest developments and opportunities within the industry. This creates a cost-effective and impactful way to grow awareness, build trust, and position your brand as a leader in AI.

Sponsorship packages include:

• Dedicated ad placements in the Unaligned newsletter

• Product highlights shared with Scoble’s 500,000+ X followers

• Curated video features and exclusive content opportunities

• Flexible formats for creative brand storytelling

📩 Interested? Contact [email protected], @samlevin on X, +1-415-827-3870

Just Three Things

According to Scoble and Cronin, the top three relevant and recent happenings

​​Apple Takes Full Control of iPhone Chips to Power Next-Gen AI

Apple now fully controls all core chip components in its latest iPhones, especially with the new A19 Pro chip, in order to prioritize AI workloads. The A19 Pro integrates neural accelerators directly into GPU cores, and Apple has introduced its own wireless chip (N1) and second-generation modem (C1X). These changes reduce dependence on suppliers like Broadcom and Qualcomm and position Apple to deliver stronger on-device AI performance, along with improved efficiency and battery life. CNBC

Oxford Becomes First UK University to Roll Out ChatGPT Edu for All Students and Staff

The University of Oxford has become the first UK institution to provide all students and staff with access to ChatGPT Edu, a version of the AI tool designed for education. The rollout follows a year-long trial and is part of a five-year partnership with OpenAI. Oxford leaders said the move supports digital transformation, research, and personalized learning, while OpenAI called it a model for how AI can enhance higher education. The launch includes training on generative AI tools with a focus on ethics, critical thinking, and responsible use. BBC

AI-Generated Child Abuse Chatbots Spark Urgent Calls for UK Regulation

​​A UK watchdog uncovered a chatbot site offering explicit scenarios with preteen characters and AI-generated child sexual abuse images, raising urgent concerns about misuse of the technology. The Internet Watch Foundation reported a surge in such material and urged stronger regulations, while the UK government is preparing new laws to criminalize AI-generated abuse and hold platforms accountable under the Online Safety Act. The Guardian

Scoble’s Top Five X Posts